JustBritneySpears.Com

Celebrities and Breast Size – They’re Not as Naturally Blessed as You Might Think

The obsession over cosmetic perfection and, more recently, breast size, has sparked a rash of Hollywood “upsizing” in the breast department. Who’s natural, what cup size are they, and who’s had breast surgery? The answers may or may not be surprising. In other words, you might be shocked at just how much a push up bra can deceive to the tune of 1,2 and even three cup sizes!

Celebrities – How they Influence What We Want in a Breast Size

What determines the size of a full grown woman’s breasts? Is it primarily environmental or outside influences, or is it all “in the genes”? The final size of a woman’s mature breasts is mostly determined by heredity and can range from very small AA cups to very full EE cups. Breast size varies greatly among women, but the average breast size is a B cup, and all sizes and shapes are normal and healthy, although they may not fit the conventional idea of breast beauty.

For some reason, probably the increasing popularity of breast augmentation surgery and the overwhelming number of female celebrities who are considered sexy who have this breast size, the common perception today is that the perfect breast size is a C cup. See some famous celebrity breast sizes below, and you’ll see these famous women are as diverse as the rest of us. Although they may all look like they have C cups in the movies or in videos, you’ll see what they’ve really got without the padding, underwire and inserts!

Celebrity Breast Sizes – Does Their Cup Truly Runneth Over?

Jennifer Lopez breast size: Modest B cup

Angelina Jolie breast size : C cup : Hate to break it to you, but these are probably real. Yes, she is genetic perfection in the form of a waif thin body and large breasts, I’m afraid.

Britney Spears breast size : Modest C cup (when she’s not pregnant or is on the slimmer side)

Christina Aguilera breast size : Pre Breast Implants : A cup Post Breast Implants : Large C cup

Catherine Bell breast size : Large D cup : Not definitive that she has implants, but I suspect she was a fairly busty woman who also had implants, which is why this large breast size looks so natural on her, and yet she doesn’t have a whole lot of sagging for such a large size.

Jessica Simpson breast size : Small D cup : Jessica Simpson is another celebrity that has been puzzled over as to whether she has implants. Some “experts” say yes, and some say she’s natural. I just want to know how she lost all that weight and didn’t lose a bit of breast size. Hmmm…

Jessica Alba breast size : Small B cup : Although Jessica Alba is one of those celebs that has worn many a push up bras and I suspect has also worn gel inserts to change cup size so drastically between films, you can tell she has a natural breast size of about a small B cup. She also has very little body fat, which accounts for her perfectly natural smaller size.

While many of us may not be happy with the appearance of our breasts, it is good to know that they do come in all sizes and shapes, and we can actually improve their appearance – whether it be increasing their size, enhancing the shape and contour of the breast, or adding to the perkiness, firmness and perfect beauty of the female form, if we are not happy with our current breast size and appearance. There are lots of ways to do this. Massage, exercise, supplementation and just an all around good diet are a few of the ways.

It’s just good to know that some of the most beautiful celebrities in the world have either had a lot of help from a plastic surgeon in the breast department, or they are not as large as they are made to look on screen. It goes to show that the most important thing is that you are happy with yourself, and feeling beautiful has much more to do with confidence and other areas other than your breasts.

Visit Natural Breast Enhancement for more information on breast enlargement products, reviews and tips to get the best results. Danna Schneider is the founder of Natural Breast Guide : Comprehensive Guide to Natural Breast Beauty .

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Danna_Schneider

Britney Spears. Oh the tongue-wagging that goes on in supermarket checkout lines these days as moms across America breathe a collective sigh, thankful (with the possible exception of the fame and the money) that Miss Spears is somebody else’s problem. Thankful that their daughters, while troublesome in their own right, haven’t reached the melting point of a Spears kid. (Little sister Jamie Lynn, 16, is reportedly expecting another little Spears.)

Aren’t we just full of ourselves; such great parents are we!

And didn’t you just love it when Momma Spears got her parenting book unceremoniously yanked from publication? Oh, the irony.

The most ironic thing, however, has absolutely nothing to do with the Spears family and what we perceive to be (actually, judge) their shortcomings. As a society, we are collectively making sport of their pain and are gleefully judging each failing move they make in order to validate and overlook our own mistake-filled worlds. This is classic Law of Attraction, but not in a good way.

Britney can be forgiven. She is a child who has grown up in a spotlight of cruelty, as everyone from the media, bus drivers, foreign governments, and fast food workers have “scornfully” weighed in on every negative stumble she has taken, impatient for the next chapter. It’s all nothing more than a heaping Roman helping of bread and circuses to them; to Britney Spears, it is her life.

So who or what is a Britney Spears? She is, like any of us, a product of all that surrounds her. She is human, and she is hurting. She is immature and foolish sometimes, and her demons are worn upon her sleeve for all to see. This makes her more honest than most. She tries, but without a level support system, she oftentimes fails. (That’s the part we like; it makes us feel so much better about ourselves!)

Britney Spears, besides fighting a hostile media and disingenuousness all around her, is also fighting a terrible disease. Whether she wins the fight, or is too tired to fight any longer, she remains in the boxing ring of alcoholism and drug abuse. I don’t think she even tries to hide it anymore.

We would look at her (judge her) in an entirely different light were she afflicted with cancer or leukemia; you know, an approvable disease. But no matter how much the medical field classifies substance abuse as a disease, it is still looked down upon and only becomes a disease when it is our own, or someone’s we care about.

So what is the answer, both for Britney as well as for us? Because to suggest the insatiable thirst of enjoying ringside seats with the downfall of the Spears family as the main event as anything but a two-way street is completely dishonest. We need Britney to fall, just as much as she needs us to take her by the hand and help her off the ground. Left to its own devices, this scenario has just one end, and look no farther than Anna Nicole Smith or Elvis if you want to know what that is. Then, when that happens, we’ll all enjoy 24-hour news cycle coverage as we again cluck our tongues and judge some more.

There is another alternative, however. And it will salve both sides of this sick fence.

The Law of Attraction promises that whatever we desire, as long as the feelings and thoughts are directed and true, that the Universe will provide us with whatever we want.

We have all wanted what we have gotten with the ongoing Spears train wreck, and this is true on both sides. We have attracted this, and so has Britney, her sister, their mother, all of the boyfriends, and all of the hangers-on who have profited from their misery. We have all been excellent attractors, and continue to do so as the game gets ratcheted up to the point that the next stop will be the Los Angeles County Coroners Office. How many have thought when Britney has permanently left the stage, Jamie Lynn Spears is waiting in the wings to assume the starring role. Haven’t we all had enough of this?

We deserve better of ourselves, and those two wonderful girls and their families deserve better, too. Let’s stop this now. We collectively created it; can we not turn it around and each enjoy life as it is meant to be enjoyed?

It’s not too late, and if by providence the Spears sisters read this article, please, girls, take your power back and refuse to be a part of this putrid pantomime and live! Live your lives and focus on your wonderful babies, your most beautiful creations ever. Use what the Universe gave you and live the Law of Attraction in a positive way. You’ve already proven how talented you are when it comes to manifesting the Law of Attraction; now it’s time to use it positively and reclaim your lives.

We can also want this for them, can’t we? We can want and think and feel the thoughts that will help them manifest this wonderful gift. Can’t we do that for them? And if not for them, can’t we wish it for their children?

The Law of Attraction is everyone’s gift from the Universe, and it is no less a gift for the girls who seemingly already have everything. The Law of Attraction is for Britney, too.

Lee McCain lives in scenic Oregon with his wife, Beth and their children. Lee is a published author and is also an instructor and lecturer in applying the Law of Attraction to attain what you desire in your life. Check out the Law of Attraction radio show on Youtube that is both informative and entertaining.

Fame is not immortal but short lived in this fast moving world, specifically in Hollywood, by and large. Ganesha witnesses the same in Britney Spears’ Horoscope. Of late, she has come to know about her teenage sister Jamie Lynn Spears’ pregnancy. Some believe that she is not getting enough attention from media by and large so she is passing through the phase of depression and some believe that because of family problems, she is losing control over her mind and emotions both. As per the news, she was hooked up with a photographer too on 23rd December 2007. Astrology can throw light on these matters.

Britney is a Sagittarian and this sign desires and acquires complete freedom generally, as their sense of freedom is very high by nature. If that freedom is not given to them, they will surely feel uncomfortable. As per Vedic Astrology System, she is born with Virgo Ascendant and Pisces Navmansha (Divisional chart widely known as D-9). Pisces being 7th sign from her Ascendant which signifies ’self’, it is very clear that she can be her own enemy!

Moon signifies mind and related matters. Her Moon is with Venus the significator of love and a strong malefic planet Ketu the South Node. At present, she is passing through major period of Rahu (the North Node) which is aspecting the Moon and sub period is of Moon itself. This period has started from 12th October 2007 and it will rule till 12th April 2009. No wonder, mind is completely under negative forces. Rahu denotes Illusions and Moon governs the mind! This is what her Vedic Astrology Mahadasha and Antardasha says.

As per Ganesha’s view, she is passing through a phase where in she is seeking greater attention from all the sides. At the same time, she is troubled much by unnecessary paparazzi followers and also by family problems. She deserves true care and nurturing along with the freedom that she requires by nature. Transiting Jupiter as per Vedic Astrology System has entered Sagittarius on 22nd November 2007 and it is enhancing her ’sense of freedom’. No wonder, she is seeking sexual freedom and satisfaction both. On the other hand, she is actually trying to run away from current situation around her wherein she has no ex-boyfriend in life (who doesn’t know about Justin Timberlake, famous singer and her ‘childhood friend’). She is also mature enough age wise and fame seems to be fading out. She has also lost custody of children. This indicates that she is ‘trapped’ all the way and passing through a very ‘trying time’ in her life, specifically after she entered North Node’s major period and sub period of Moon, she has been changing clothes very frequently, she has also been fighting with paparazzi guys around and she hooked up with a photographer too. Her trip to Los Angles with a photographer on 23rd December 2007 doesn’t seem a fake story after considering all these factors.

Ganesha feels that she will have to control herself much more after April 2008 and must undergo proper psychological treatment otherwise she has all scopes of driving herself crazier than this and may develop negative or suicidal tendencies. ‘Return of Nodes’ in her chart will be brining in the results of Karmic Baggages that she is carrying at present and she is most likely to remain in the limelight due to her troubles at least for next two years.

Ganesha wishes she gets over this very soon and acquires the much needed balance and control over her life, behaviour and thinking.

Ganesha remembers a famous quote

‘Sanity is lost as often as the pain is given,
But the adjustment is real so we fall in love with equilibrium’

Ganesha wishes good luck to Britney Spears.

Ganesha’s Grace,
Bhavesh N. Pattni
The GaneshaSpeaks Team

GaneshaSpeaks.com offers free and personalized Horoscope and Astrology for career, money, business, love, romance and property

You just can’t get of Britney Spears, can you? She’s like a bad penny. Her face keeps turning up in the media; her voice on talk shows, videos and radio. She’s even had cameos in movies such as Austin Powers: Goldmember. And now even your nose can’t get away from her – there are three Britney Spears perfumes floating around for you to run screaming into the night away from.

Ok, so I’m not a Britney Spears fan, but you don’t have to be a fan of the woman to like her perfumes. At least, I don’t think so. All that’s required is a nose and an appreciation of good smells. That is to say, I liked it; I’m not sure if you will, but it can’t hurt to try!

Britney Spears perfumes come in four different flavors; Curious (released 2004 and won best perfume in 2004 and 2005), Fantasy (released 2005), In Control (released 2006), and Fantasy Midnight, the newest to the stable. Britney Spears perfumes are found in department stores and online specialty perfume stores and online department stores. You usually can find the best deals on the web – but you can’t try before you buy.

Britney Spears perfumes are made my Elizabeth Arden with complete cooperation of the star. In other words, Britney does know these are being sold in her name and is most likely getting a big slice of the perfume pie. Britney Spears is just one in a long line of celebrities diving into the world of perfumes, swimming in the same pool as Elizabeth Taylor, Prince and fellow blonde Paris Hilton.

The first Britney Spears perfume was labeled Curious. It reportedly earned over 100 million dollars following its debut and there are reports that Britney got over 10 percent of that profit. The bottle came in pink or blue and looked kind of like a deformed diamond. The scent was light, with some complaining they couldn’t smell it after a few minutes, but nearly everyone surveyed agreed that they would recommend it to a friend.

The second perfume to be introduced was Fantasy, and Elizabeth Arden went all out on the marketing campaign. Unfortunately, wearers of the new perfume weren’t impressed and many said that marketing the scent of strawberry shortcakes turned out to be more of a fantasy than the perfume did. Also noticed – the bottle looks strangely like the Love Potion Number 9 bottle.

In Control was Britney Spears next perfume. It was supposed to be a combination of Curious and Fantasy, but it turned out to be more of a bomb than a blast. Wearers constantly complained about the weak scent and the constant need to reapply the fragrance to continue smelling it, a shame since 90% of the people surveyed said they liked the smell.

Midnight is the latest Britney Spears perfume and it hasn’t done much better than the ones before it. Wearers complained that instead of being too weak, this one was so strong many people felt sick or nauseous after wearing it for a few hours. The scent also got harsh reviews, with comments such as grape bubblegum and grape kool-aid being the most common.

Expect to pay anywhere from $50 to $70 if you go shopping at a department store, or $30 to $50 if you shop at a discount perfume store (prices for a 3.3oz bottle). In the end, I think it just has to be tried to be determined. Seems like some people love it and some don’t. I’d say just try it out on you and if you like it, come back to the house and buy it.

Britney Spears is an American singer, songwriter, actress and author.

As a child, she appeared in a number of off-Broadway productions, as well as the television programs, in a spot in Star Search, and for about a year in the New Mickey Mouse Club on the Disney Channel.

Britney Spears rose to international stardom in 1999 when she released her debut album, …Baby One More Time, which spawned five hit singles, including one (also called …Baby One More Time) which rose to the number 1 spot in the Billboard Hot 100.

Britney’s subsequent albums and singles have also been huge commercial successes, and have also received critical acclaim: she has been nominated for several Grammy Awards, and in fact won one for the single, Toxic, which was released in 2004 (from the album, In The Zone) . In total, Britney Spears has sold over 80 million records worldwide. In fact, according to the Record Industry Association of America, Britney Spears is the 8th best-selling female artist in American music history, and has sold over 30 million albums in the US alone.

As well as her music career, Britney Spears has also appeared in various movies and television programs, including starring in the 2002 movie, Crossroads. Britney has also participated in a number of advertising campaigns and has her own perfume line.

In 2004, Britney Spears married Kevin Federline. Although the couple divorced in 2006, she does have two children from her marriage, Sean Preston and Jayden James. As a result of these events, as well as a custody battle for the children, and controversial public behavior, Britney Spears’ personal life has been subject to as much, if not more, media interest as her music and career.

Britney Spears was yet again caught flashing her panty less private parts – this time at a party after MTV Video Music Awards on Sept 9.

The faux pas happened after she gave a critically panned performance at the awards event.

Spears hit the Luxor club around 1 a.m. and within half-hour, she gulped down two vodka-sodas and a kamikaze or two, reports The New York Daily News.

According to a source, ’she just kept saying, ‘Y’all, this is so much fun’.”

The mum of two was seen without her underwear as she got into a waiting limousine outside the hotel.

The singer has been repeatedly exposing her undercarriages during public appearances.

“What is she thinking? She’s a mother of two and here she is flashing her goods to the world,” Contactmusic quoted the source, as telling Wenn

Sunday night was supposed to be Britney Spears’ big comeback.

Her VMA showing marked her first real performance since, well, I can’t even remember. And it was a dismal failure. For once, all the reviewers — from the bloggers to the television personalities to the mainstream print publications — agreed. Britney Spears sucked hardcore.

The first problem is that her performance was over-hyped. She’d been driving (and drinking) all over L.A. with illusionist Criss Angel, who was supposed to be creating a visually stunning comeback performance with her. For reasons that haven’t been officially announced — some sources are reporting that MTV couldn’t get insurance for Britney’s risky on-stage tricks, while others are saying MTV felt the performance would be too controversial — Britney ended up doing a very standard stage show. The deck was stacked against her from the start; people expected smoke and mirrors, and what Britney had was a few back-up dancers. But what really hurt her fans, myself included, is that it felt like Britney didn’t even try.

A website recently collected the YouTube videos of Britney’s past VMA performances. I actually got chills watching them. Say what you want about Britney’s vocal abilities, or about her personal life or antics, but this young woman used to be an absolutely phenomenal performer. She connected with her audience immediately, and she always put on an engaging, high-energy show. It’s the Britney we were all so excited to see again — finally! — on Sunday night. But that Britney never showed up. The woman on the stage was just going through the motions, as if none of it meant anything. And that is what has her fans angry.

So: can Britney Spears recover from this? The question I’m asking myself after the VMAs is more along the lines of does Britney Spears want to recover from this? I wonder if she’s just given up. I can’t say I blame her. The unwavering media scrutiny, the failed marriages, the allegations of terrible mothering. If I were Britney, I’d look back at my past performances and think to myself, “So this is what all that hard work earned me? F— this.” I think Britney Spears got over us way before we got over her. She’s been going through the motions, because this is the only work she knows how to do, but her heart hasn’t been in it for some time now.

I’d like to say there’s no recovering from this for Britney, but I think there is. I think that whenever she’s ready to show up and put on an amazing show again, we’ll be ready to watch it and cheer her on. We watched Britney grow up. We listened to her albums, cheered at her performances, read about her in magazines, saw her on TV, and, if you can believe it, some people even saw Crossroads. She was the face of a generation. We idolized her. And then we watched her fall apart. But if there’s anything the public loves as much as a good trainwreck, it’s a great comeback. When Britney’s ready to do that, the audience will still be there.

For now, I think Britney would be wise to move away from Los Angeles, perhaps back home to Louisiana. Spend some time with your parents and your kids, Britney. Stay out of the bar. Get therapy. Get your head on straight. Figure out what you want to do with your life, and then do it with the drive and ferocity we used to see in you. If it’s singing and dancing, that’s great, we’ll be here to watch you. If it’s something else entirely, that’s great, too. But I think it’s clear, darling, to everyone but you, that whatever you’re doing right now isn’t working.

The consensus is clear: Britney Spears performed like she was sloshing blindfolded through mud at MTV’s Video Music Awards. No one disputes that the troubled pop princess royally mangled her much-heralded comeback. But what about the nastiest comments of all — those about her body? “Lard and Clear,” read Monday’s headline in the New York Post. “The bulging belly she was flaunting was SO not hot,” wrote E! Online. And so on.

Was it fair? Did Spears, lest we forget a mother of two, deserve to be held up against the standard of her once fantastically toned abs, sculpted by sessions of 1,000 tummy crunches? Or was she asking for it by choosing that unforgiving black-sequined bikini?

More profoundly, in an age where skinny models and skeletal actresses are under scrutiny for the message they’re sending young girls, what does it say that we’re excoriating a young woman for a little thickness in her middle?

Certainly people were curious to see her. The show drew 7.1 million viewers Sunday, up 23 percent over last year’s VMAs, and was the highest-rated cable program of the year among people aged 12 to 34, according to Nielsen Media Research.

On the morning after what the VH1 channel called Spears’ “already historic” performance, the blogosphere was buzzing with opinions. For every “fat” comment there was an impassioned retort. “Give her a break,” wrote one blogger on Aboutthink.com. “The girl’s had two kids — I hope I’m a size 10 after having kids!”

“OK, she isn’t fat,” wrote another. “But she isn’t fit enough to be wearing (or not wearing) what she is.”

For many observers, the issue was not so much the body, but the body in THAT outfit.

“In that ensemble, you just can’t have an ounce of anything extra,” said Janice Min, editor of the celebrity magazine US Weekly. “Many women wouldn’t eat for days if they were wearing that.”

“Did she look better than 99 percent of women? Yes,” added Min. “But compared to her earlier form, she probably didn’t look as good.”

Besides, said Min, “Britney Spears has always been about the whole package. It’s never been 100 percent about the talent. Is it sexist? Probably, but she’s built a career on an image of sexiness.”

Talk of Spears’ physique comes amid an increasingly critical focus on overly skinny actresses in Hollywood, who’ve largely replaced supermodels as the world’s fashion plates. It’s hard to pick up a celebrity magazine without a critical photo of, say, Angelina Jolie’s birdlike arms. And curvy actresses are getting positive attention, from Oscar-winner Jennifer Hudson of “Dreamgirls” to Golden Globe-winner America Ferrara of TV’s “Ugly Betty.”

In the fashion industry, there’s been an effort to promote healthier-looking models. “Girls aren’t looking as skinny this season as they did,” said Suze Yalof Scwhartz, executive editor-at-large for Glamour Magazine. “There’s food backstage. They’re looking sexier.” At Glamour, she noted, a model won’t be featured “if she shows too much clavicle.”

The nastier headlines about Spears are uncalled for, Schwartz said, but at the same time, “when you walk around the stage in a black bikini in front of millions of viewers, people are going to notice.” She added that though Spears doesn’t have the perfect body she once did, “Most women would die for the body she has now.”

An obvious question is whether a male performer would have been subjected to the same standards. Many would say no; Dave Zinczenko, editor of Men’s Health magazine, says yes.

“Listen, any time you go on national television and dance in barely any clothing, you’re going to be facing a lot of scrutiny,” Zinczenko says. “Anybody would be asking for it.” Not that many people weren’t pulling for Spears, he notes: “If she had come back, she would have been the toast of the country.”

And certainly she had a lot to come back from over the past few years: Well-documented parenting mishaps — remember the baby on her lap in the driver’s seat? A messy divorce from husband Kevin Federline. The famous crotch photos. The bizarre head-shaving incident. Rehab.

And now this.

“I kind of feel bad for her,” said Shelley Wade, a DJ at New York City pop station Z100. “She looked really nervous. And then now, I’m looking at all these blogs this morning about how everybody thinks she’s fat and I’m like, `What! Fat?’ She wasn’t fat.”

How all this will impact Spears’ career, and sales of her new album, has yet to be seen. “I just felt like that performance was make or break for her comeback,” says Wade. “Now with last night’s performance, she’s just kind of put herself back in the same boat … everybody thinks she’s a train wreck.”

But the single of “Gimme More,” the song she destroyed onstage, is off to a great start in the Top 40, says Sean Ross of Edison Research, which tracks radio play. “A great VMA performance would have probably closed the deal for her, but she’s still got until Thanksgiving to do other good performances and to release a strong album with other hits on it,” he said.

In any case, it seems it would never be wise to write an obituary of Spears’ career.

“With everything Britney, we think this is the last chance,” says Min. “The fact is, it never is.

“At least this puts attention back on her as a performer. My sense is she’d rather be judged on that than on the rehab, the drinking and the partying.”

An out-of-shape, out-of-touch Britney Spears has delivered what was destined to be the most talked about performance of the MTV Video Music Awards – but for all the wrong reasons.

Kicking off the show with her new single, Gimme More, Spears looked bleary and unprepared, much like her recent tabloid exploits on the streets of Los Angeles.

She walked through her dance moves with little enthusiasm. It appeared she had forgotten the entire art of lip-synching. And, perhaps most unforgivable given her once-taut frame, she looked embarrassingly out of shape

You just can’t get of Britney Spears, can you? She’s like a bad penny. Her face keeps turning up in the media; her voice on talk shows, videos and radio. She’s even had cameos in movies such as Austin Powers: Goldmember. And now even your nose can’t get away from her – there are three Britney Spears perfumes floating around for you to run screaming into the night away from.

Ok, so I’m not a Britney Spears fan, but you don’t have to be a fan of the woman to like her perfumes. At least, I don’t think so. All that’s required is a nose and an appreciation of good smells. That is to say, I liked it; I’m not sure if you will, but it can’t hurt to try!

Britney Spears perfumes come in four different flavors; Curious (released 2004 and won best perfume in 2004 and 2005), Fantasy (released 2005), In Control (released 2006), and Fantasy Midnight, the newest to the stable. Britney Spears perfumes are found in department stores and online specialty perfume stores and online department stores. You usually can find the best deals on the web – but you can’t try before you buy.

Britney Spears perfumes are made my Elizabeth Arden with complete cooperation of the star. In other words, Britney does know these are being sold in her name and is most likely getting a big slice of the perfume pie. Britney Spears is just one in a long line of celebrities diving into the world of perfumes, swimming in the same pool as Elizabeth Taylor, Prince and fellow blonde Paris Hilton.

The first Britney Spears perfume was labeled Curious. It reportedly earned over 100 million dollars following its debut and there are reports that Britney got over 10 percent of that profit. The bottle came in pink or blue and looked kind of like a deformed diamond. The scent was light, with some complaining they couldn’t smell it after a few minutes, but nearly everyone surveyed agreed that they would recommend it to a friend.

The second perfume to be introduced was Fantasy, and Elizabeth Arden went all out on the marketing campaign. Unfortunately, wearers of the new perfume weren’t impressed and many said that marketing the scent of strawberry shortcakes turned out to be more of a fantasy than the perfume did. Also noticed – the bottle looks strangely like the Love Potion Number 9 bottle.

In Control was Britney Spears next perfume. It was supposed to be a combination of Curious and Fantasy, but it turned out to be more of a bomb than a blast. Wearers constantly complained about the weak scent and the constant need to reapply the fragrance to continue smelling it, a shame since 90% of the people surveyed said they liked the smell.

Midnight is the latest Britney Spears perfume and it hasn’t done much better than the ones before it. Wearers complained that instead of being too weak, this one was so strong many people felt sick or nauseous after wearing it for a few hours. The scent also got harsh reviews, with comments such as grape bubblegum and grape kool-aid being the most common.

Expect to pay anywhere from $50 to $70 if you go shopping at a department store, or $30 to $50 if you shop at a discount perfume store (prices for a 3.3oz bottle). In the end, I think it just has to be tried to be determined. Seems like some people love it and some don’t. I’d say just try it out on you and if you like it, come back to the house and buy it.